Leadership Analysis Performance and Profitability

Question: Discuss about theLeadership Analysis: Performance and Profitability. Answer: Narrative The capacity to work for a reputable firm with self-driving workmates is a wish for any student that has graduated. Moreover, the feeling is greater when the management offers you a permanent employment, thus, becoming one of the critical assets of the enterprise that strive to improve performance and profitability. Notably, I had searched for various internship opportunities in several technology firms during the summer holiday of 2016 but failed to acquire a chance due to lack of certificate to indicate course completion. However, after several applications and also on the verge of giving up towards internship, my parents were glad to serve me with a letter from Sony Corporation. A closer look onto the paper, it came from the head of the human resource and the person requested me to report to work the following week which was 2/5/2015. Notably, there was joy in the whole family due to this rare but vital opportunity to develop financially and professionally. The first day of reporting to work was matriculation day in which the new recruits were taught on various organizational culture and the expectations towards the assigned tasks. I came to understand that Sony Corporation strives on strong work ethics that are committed towards deliverance of quality and satisfying commodities (Sony.net 2016). After the fresher course that took two days, I was placed in charge of ten personnel and tasked with the responsibility of evaluating the work environment within the company. Significantly, we delivered a report which concluded that the department needed some expansion due to the increase in the number of employees. To achieve these recommendations, the group suggested the utilization of an open-office system that allows people to consult one another in a shorter period besides reducing the amount of money the corporation could be using to construct offices. The report reached the management after a week of research and interview that encompassed the employees, senior management, and non-technical officials. However, the same procedure had been conducted five years ago, but the program failed in its implementation stage due to increased resistance from the personnel. Conversely, after proper evaluation of the recommendations, the manager decided to execute the endorsements that highlighted the need to initiate open plan sitting system in the business. The model would reduce the expense the company uses to furnish particular offices besides easing communication among the staff. Analysis The key factor that required a critical decision from the manager was the need to implement open plan system in which workers would have to work in a common section. As such, the offices would be removed and allow easy and prompt communication among the workmates. Due to the resistance and dilemma in this approach in the previous years, the leader acted in rationality to implement the concept after forming a task force that evaluated the situation. Consequently, situational and contingency models are utilized to analyse the actions of the manager and the effects of this action on the welfare of the personnel. Elements of the Theories Notably, situational approach model helps the manager determine the direction of a task given that no specific leadership technique best fits circumstances (Fiedler 2015, p. 920). Further, the theory is also easy to apply to the personnel in an organization thus making it appropriate for the manager at Sony Corporation to control the differences that might arise in the company due to the coming changes. The model also helps the managers to determine the level of cooperation that exist among the workers. Consequently, the administrator is capable of organizing the personnel into groups thus enhancing teamwork and performance (Hon, Bloom, and Crant 2014, p. 922). Dynamism is also developed among the staff and leaders, a factor that enables the company to prosper regardless of the situations that occur in the industry (Andersen, Elliot, Swatman, Trauth, and Bjrn-Andersen 2013, p. 156). Essentially, the theory allows the manager to adjust and provide timely intervention in any case that influences the profitability of the business. Observably, the situational leadership approach allowed the manager to think critically about the need to launch the open plan method. Despite the difficulties associated with the system and the initial resistance by the employees, the administrator implemented the recommendation made by the task force. Observably, the new systems advantages outweigh the adversities given that the workers will be encouraged to work as a team and improve the competitiveness of the firm. However, the bad points on the style of the manager are the assumption that the personnel is highly motivated to propel the company in the industry through hard work (Du, Swaen, Lindgreen, and Sen 2013, p. 157). The administrator disregards the resistance to change that is highlighted by some members of the institution. This negligence is disastrous to the future performance of the agency since some employees believe that their welfare is ignored hence the lack of importance in the firm. The success of the company in the technological industry made the manager assume that the follower mentality is workable among the employees (Fiedler 2015, p. 232). This external factor affects the thinking of the director by believing that the decision does not directly influence the association with the customers. The internal factors such as increased collaboration among the workers due to the implementation of the concept also led to the making of the decision on the work environment. However, contingency theory states that the achievement of a manager depends on the decision one makes in the current case that affects a company (Northouse 2015). As such, aspects such as personality, the impacts of the situation, and the reaction of the members of the group largely affect the decision of the manager. The leadership style of an individual, therefore, is determined by the relationship one have with the subordinates, and these are concepts are effected through the provision of punishments and benefits concerning the action of the personnel (Oreg and Berson 2015, p. 52). Essentially, I believe that the manager made the right decision to introduce and open plan system in the company. The key gains of this system are its ability to promote cohesion, teamwork, unity, and proper flow of communication among the personnel. Additionally, the stakeholders also benefit from this plan through the increases in profits that are shared equally among the investors (Lussier and Achua 2015). References Andersen, K.V., Elliot, S., Swatman, P.M., Trauth, E.M. and Bjrn-Andersen, N. eds., 2013.Seeking success in e-business: A multidisciplinary approach(Vol. 123). Springer.Du, Shuili, Valrie Swaen, Adam Lindgreen, and Sankar Sen. "The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility."Journal of business ethics114, no. 1 (2013): 155-169. Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A. and Sen, S., 2013. The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility.Journal of business ethics,114(1), pp.155-169. Fiedler, F., 2015. Contingency theory of leadership.Organizational Behavior 1: Essential Theories of Motivation and Leadership, p.232. Hon, A.H., Bloom, M. and Crant, J.M., 2014. Overcoming resistance to change and enhancing creative performance.Journal of Management,40(3), pp.919-941. Lussier, R.N. and Achua, C.F., 2015.Leadership: Theory, application, skill development. Nelson Education. Northouse, P.G., 2015.Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications. Oreg, S. and Berson, Y., 2015. Personality and Charismatic Leadership in Context: The Moderating Role of Situational Stress.Personnel Psychology, 68(1), pp.49-77. Sony.net. (2016). Sony Global - Ethics and Compliance. [online] Available at: https://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/csr_report/compliance/ [Accessed 11 Oct. 2016].